Finished benchmark shape.
Dossier / live reference cards
Every card is a fact.
Hourly source check is green.
AI Resource Hub
v2 / terminal# route boot: benchmarks / meta / glm 5.1 reasoning
airh > since-last-visit
1h Recomputed benchmark-weighted quality scores
1h Synced Chatbot Arena benchmark track
1h Updated speed measurements
1h Validated official pricing snapshots
airh > open /benchmarks/meta/glm-5.1-reasoning/
Z.ai
GLM-5.1 Reasoning
AA reports GLM-5.1 Reasoning at 51 with 200k context; Kilo lists GLM 5.1 at 49.4% coding completion.
confidence: medium
DSWE cost and time are mid-pack, with compact output tokens.
AA Index 51 / Kilo #8 coding
Current GLM row is useful, but floor-specific honesty and citation data is thin.
Current signal
AA Index 51 / Kilo #8 coding
Evidence completeness
58%
4 score dimensions represented.
DSWE
18% pass@1
Calculation
Score components
Correct, grounded answers on ordinary verifiable tasks.
Follows exact user constraints and output formats.
Avoids unsupported confidence and remains stable across runs.
Handles non-flashy reasoning without brittle failures.
Completes tool, coding, and agent-style tasks when evidence exists.
Cost, speed, token burn, verbosity, and friction.
Evidence
Sources used
- Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
- Kilo Bench
- context window evidence
Caveat
What to watch
Current GLM row is worth tracking, but public floor-specific honesty and instruction data is thin.
Meaning
How to read the score
Each score is a 0-100 saturation scale. A score of 100 means that benchmark lane is complete for this model. Floor Capability is the finished benchmark shape; Operating Envelope, Frontier Reality, and Research Trust are provisional tabs that need prompt-pack backfill. Confidence is evidence quality, not another model grade. Evidence % is source coverage, not capability.
Citations